Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | -nausea- | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | sanpop | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | junkmener | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | darthkid | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Omniscience , 5 Color Legends , Grixis Bounce , Grixis Control , Grixis Crimes , Grixis Reanimator , Izzet Aggro , Izzet Artist's Monument , Izzet Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Spirebluff Canal ranks #406 out of approximately 405 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Spirebluff Canal is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 48.75 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.3%. Spirebluff Canal has a win rate of 77.6%, making it 4.5% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 27 | 83.3% | 16 |
| Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 5 | 82.0% | 3 |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 6 | 80.6% | 3 |
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 37 | 80.6% | 19 |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 14 | 77.6% | 8 |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 75 | 77.6% | 34 |
| Hearth Elemental | Creature — Elemental // Sorcery — Adventure | 10 | 77.4% | 5 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 113 | 75.9% | 54 |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 45 | 75.3% | 18 |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 7 | 73.3% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Spirebluff Canal than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 95.0% | 73.6% | +21.4% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 5 | 86.2% | 75.7% | +10.5% |
| Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 2 | 5 | 83.3% | 75.8% | +7.6% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 18 | 82.1% | 75.5% | +6.6% |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 7 | 81.8% | 75.5% | +6.3% |
| Ral, Crackling Wit | Legendary Planeswalker — Ral | 4 | 10 | 83.3% | 77.6% | +5.7% |
| Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 13 | 86.9% | 81.9% | +5.0% |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 2 | 14 | 81.8% | 77.4% | +4.4% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 57 | 80.7% | 76.3% | +4.4% |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 62 | 80.8% | 77.0% | +3.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Convoke | 547 | 98.4% | 48.5% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 293 | 100.0% | 52.8% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 142 | 100.0% | 71.6% |
| Temur Otters | 127 | 37.8% | 29.5% |
| Unknown Archetype | 30 | 8.3% | 34.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.